|
|
Post by loopy1782 on Oct 28, 2011 21:27:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by XxSuperShadicxX on Oct 28, 2011 21:30:46 GMT -5
thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by loopy1782 on Oct 28, 2011 21:34:22 GMT -5
No problem. Video review added.  |
|
|
|
Post by thesuperinvader on Oct 28, 2011 21:36:23 GMT -5
Lol the other day everyone said "IGNorant are Gonna give the game a 3 " today, 8.5 plus editors choice
Everyone who says it deserves a 9 no it doesn't. As someone who owns it it is fantastic but far too short
|
|
|
|
Post by Chini on Oct 28, 2011 21:36:44 GMT -5
It would be funny if they gave like a 3 or something. Sonic fans will rage and someone would probably get killed in the process LOL
Thank for that video
|
|
|
|
Post by thesuperinvader on Oct 28, 2011 21:38:09 GMT -5
I didn't even get why people said that ign have liked new sonic since all stars racing, sonic 4 and sonic colors
|
|
|
|
Post by twilightzoney on Oct 28, 2011 22:08:25 GMT -5
Lol the other day everyone said "IGNorant are Gonna give the game a 3 " today, 8.5 plus editors choice Everyone who says it deserves a 9 no it doesn't. As someone who owns it it is fantastic but far too short The thing is they don't know when enough is enough. Sorry I would hate to play a Sonic game who's main story is more then 10 hours long. Thats meant for games like Zelda and more traversal games. Sonic is straightforward shot. Old Sonic games lasted much less then 4 hours and they are considered great. I am fine with the score the gave it. Its just their reasons for why its got downed was what appalled me a bit. They could have got at other things. But the general consensus with IGN and Sonic is that they think Sonic is back and they did a great job. 3 good games in a row. Sonic is back baby with good quality games. I am pleased, and honestly if IGN thinks its good then that makes thing just better. 8.5 isn't considered a bad score but with todays games anything below 9 is considered trash apparently. I don't know why people think that. |
|
|
|
Post by XxSuperShadicxX on Oct 28, 2011 22:17:36 GMT -5
Plus, as stated in the ign review rant, they called the controls clunky when they purposely boosted into a wall.
|
|
|
|
Post by loopy1782 on Oct 28, 2011 22:31:10 GMT -5
Plus, as stated in the ign review rant, they called the controls clunky when they purposely boosted into a wall. If its been said once its been said 100 times over. "You cant spell IGNorant without IGN". I am curious to see what GameSpot gives Generations for a score. |
|
|
|
Post by weaster4 on Oct 29, 2011 0:16:51 GMT -5
 i was hoping that a "dreamcast sonic" would be unlocked at the end of the game or something, but oh well Still trying desperatley not to spoil the game. I might have to wait until christmas....... 
|
|
r543
Relic Team 
Posts: 408
|
Post by r543 on Oct 31, 2011 9:49:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by XxSuperShadicxX on Oct 31, 2011 10:01:27 GMT -5
It's probably a biased review. |
|
r543
Relic Team
Posts: 408
|
Post by r543 on Oct 31, 2011 10:44:28 GMT -5
It's probably a biased review. hey say that sonic 4 is good and colors and unleashed bad |
|
|
|
Post by randomxfirerecording on Oct 31, 2011 19:17:17 GMT -5
Plus, as stated in the ign review rant, they called the controls clunky when they purposely boosted into a wall. In all honesty, they do that on purpose probably because they did something like that the first time, but were unable to replicate it after playing it 1000 times without looking stupid. At least it's not as bad as the Unleashed review, where at one point he presses boost over and over and over, letting go just in time to crash into enemies and lose rings, and then slows down to jump over a ramp that otherwise is basically thrown at your face. |
|
|
|
Post by weaster4 on Oct 31, 2011 19:23:33 GMT -5
 tomorrow will be a good day for me.
|
|
i was hoping that a "dreamcast sonic" would be unlocked at the end of the game or something, but oh well
tomorrow will be a good day for me.