Debate

[XxSuperShadicxX]

Description: One person will post an opinion (On an appropriate controversial topic, and as many as needed, people will try to persuade the person to think opposite with factual evidence. Once the person who posted the opinion feels that they have enough responses (to be persuaded or not, 4 at most maybe), the person will write whether they were or were not persuaded.

Oh, and to start: All Call of Duty games are pretty much exactly the same.

[Relentless Scorpion (ssh)]

the debate game we will be debating is what you were looking for

[XxSuperShadicxX]

Jan 1, 2012 2:56:57 GMT -5 Relentless Scorpion (ssh) said:

the debate game we will be debating is what you were looking for

Thanks, I couldn't think of a proper word.

[Encoder [WantaPS]]

#DEBATE: 1# Not all COD games are the same. Most (Me no fan of COD BTW.) improve the gameplay, graphics and weapons to the previous games.

^Ive been hanging around my xbox 360 fanboy of a friend too long. IM SOUNDING LIKE HIM NAO!!!!

[CarrierHack]

I agree with the argument. Gameplay wise they play pretty much the same (Haven't played them that much though, but have played them), yes they have new weapons, but that's pretty much new 3d models + a few adjusted values (range, damage etc.), graphics wise I hardly see any improvements.
Lemme compare:

COD 4 (2007) (IW 3.0 Engine)



COD 8 (2011) (IW 5.0 Engine)


Different setting, yes. But has it improved, does it look better? In my opinion, no. Also, the engine is pretty much untouched. They don't have to make a new engine, but they could improve it. "Don't change a winning team", some people say. I understand they should not change the core gameplay, but improving the graphics won't hurt anyone. And Activision certainly has the money to hire people to do so. I personally see MW3 as an expensive (well, not really expensive when taking a look at what Activision asks for 4 recycled maps) map pack for MW2. Oh, and this: www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMSupTdz7YM
I sure love my MW2 error in MW3.

Oh, and for comparison how improving an engine is enough.

Battlefield: Bad Company (2008) (Frostbite 1.0)



Battlefield 3 (2011) (Frostbite 2.0)


Looks quite a bit better in my opinion.


However, I'm not saying Call of Duty is a bad franchise (and Battlefield a better one), I'm saying that Call of Duty IMO doesn't change much. It's a matter of opinion which game you find better. Call of Duty is more run 'n gun, Battlefield teamwork, a bit more realistic (far from really realistic though, if you want realism you should play ArmA). I personally prefer Battlefield, I tried writing this as objective as possible.

[zankuujinmujinsho]

Why make it into a game? Debating is serious shit.

[Chini]

COD4 was the best! yea COD is the same however Treyarch do kinda do some different stuff. Black ops was pretty good. MW2 and 3 is just the same and boring to me.